Mearto, I received this item as a gift from some friends along time ago and want to know the history of this and maybe the value. The tag that came with is from the Coptic Period (100-500 ad). It is only 1 1/2 inches. I am excited to hear from you about this! Deyne in Denver
unknown
Hello Deyne,
This item is a Coptic-period bronze charm, dated approximately between 100 and 500 AD, and likely originating from Late Roman or early Byzantine Egypt. Measuring 1.5 inches in length and about 0.5 inches wide, the charm is believed to serve an apotropaic function, specifically designed to ward off the evil eye.
⸻
Historical and Cultural Context
The term “Coptic” in this context refers to the transitional phase in Egyptian history when traditional Pharaonic religious practices gave way to Christianity, following Roman occupation and leading into the Byzantine era. Amulets and personal charms from this period often reflect a blend of pagan protective motifs and emergent Christian symbolism, frequently worn as pendants or sewn into garments for bodily protection.
Bronze was a common medium for votive objects in this period, valued for its durability and affordability. The patina visible—a greenish layer from copper oxidation—is consistent with authentic archaeological bronze exposed to prolonged burial or open-air aging.
The piece’s shape and pierced design suggest it was worn on a necklace, intended to protect the wearer from malevolent forces, especially those believed to be transmitted through envious or cursed gazes (the “evil eye”). Its simplicity, scale, and stylized form are all typical of personal religious items used by ordinary people rather than elite classes.
⸻
Condition and Authenticity
The corrosion and natural patina are consistent with genuine ancient bronze, and the form appears untouched by modern polishing or reconstruction. It is, however, important to note that the extremely low market price tag of $100 shown in the image might suggest either:
• A generic category label used in a retail setting (not a vetted valuation), or
• The item being of uncertain provenance or from a bulk lot of minor antiquities.
In either case, while the object is visually consistent with authentic Late Roman amulets, true confirmation of age would require metallurgical testing or context of acquisition.